Trying Flying Spying As Slying

When sicklying is like applying for flying then who needs multiplying?

Transliterations, translations and interpretations from Ahmed Raza Khan: Mohammed Aqib Qadri, Yusuf Ali, Pickthal of the The Holy Quran in the following passage (Verses 2-4) have been reverberated by me and some omissions of unneeded commentary might have been removed.

In the Name of Allâh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

[008:001] They ask you (O Muhammad [sal-Allâhu 'alayhi wa sallam]) about the spoils of war. Say: "The spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger [sal-Allâhu 'alayhi wa sallam]." So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad [sal-Allâhu 'alayhi wa sallam]), if you are believers.

[008:002] The believers are those who, when Allâh is mentioned, their hearts fear and if His Verses are recited upon them, it increased their Faith; and on their Lord they submit.

[008:003] Who upkeep prayers and from what we blessed them with is their expense.

[008:004] Those are the believers indeed. For them are grades from their Lord, and forgiveness and dignified generous blessings.


Continuation of my post about those implying that slying is not different than trying.

Psalm 40 (King James Version)
[9] I have preached righteousness in the great congregation: lo, I have not refrained my lips, O LORD, thou knowest.
[10] I have not hid thy righteousness within my heart; I have declared thy faithfulness and thy salvation: I have not concealed thy lovingkindness and thy truth from the great congregation.
[11] Withhold not thou thy tender mercies from me, O LORD: let thy lovingkindness and thy truth continually preserve me.

Proverbs 12 (New International Version)
[19] Truthful lips endure forever, but a lying tongue lasts only a moment.
[20] There is deceit in the hearts of those who plot evil, but joy for those who promote peace.
[21] No harm befalls the righteous, but the wicked have their fill of trouble.
[22] The LORD detests lying lips, but he delights in men who are truthful.

When then

When then take your sake in space
When the sore soars or more roars uproar
Or whenever forever is never then.

Healing by Revealing

Those living in darkness see not what surrounds.
But when the light shines revealing what abounds.
May they then say we never seen our founds?

New Decleration of Independence Essay Contest

When the ruling party in government becomes rogue, collogues to demagogue and destroys all forms of decent dialogue they must be on trial for long on catalogue.

The right for the individual to be treated equally, fairly and respectfully is undeniable.

Just laws are enforced equally among all.

Any trace of immoral actions from government officials constitutes an independent transparent investigation.

Wronger Hunger Angers

Letting loose muse could effuse abuse. Inner being decorates what frustrates. Consequences in subsequences become muddled from stultiloquences resulting in coherencies being infrequencies. Unrestricted indulgence in desires makes animality the normality. Observe the curve to realize that overdoing anything yields unwanted outcomes. Eat more than your fair share and lose view to some of your hair. A new desire becomes needier. Over mating uncovers laziness. A new desire becomes needier. Overvaluing materialism to any cost with less regards to what might get lost. A new desire becomes needier. Seeking approval entails even if truth is in removal. A new desire becomes needier. The desire of undesire that can’t be fulfilled unless desired.

Know what you do to grow with the flow. Ignore yore and you will remain onshore.

Disparts Decrying

Our hearts are crying while power darts wrying

And if our parts stop trying, everything starts drying

Nightmare when will you depart our prying?

My Way Or Tearaway

Some exhibit irrational and destructive behavior once they don’t have their way. They hold their way holier than anything else. When they don’t get their way they discard all principles and ethics that they once preached about. This type of behavior infiltrates many. Try looking for it and you will be surprised how common it is. You might face it on a daily basis. This type of conduct is evil as it is endorsed by arrogance. It could cause conflict. Those who practice it are pushed further and further into delusion. In order to avoid this toxoid temper and hate management are required.

Hate Fate

Secretly hidden hate adds a burden of weight. One must ask himself is such hate justifiable. Hate usually does us no good. It increases irrationalities in our realities. People we respect that influence our opinions should not be held infallible. Doing that absents our mind and promotes laziness of thinking. We should not hold a view unless we are convinced of it. After all there comes a time when we will be alone to face our fate in the lonely zone.

Does hate make sense? It usually doesn’t. One could look at things and disagree with it. Perhaps even dislike. But he doesn’t have to hate it. Because hate usually closes the door from acknowledging anything that may pass through there. The more hate builds up the more the spectrum of enlightenment is narrowed. Finally it corners the person into a state of stagnation. Selective learning becomes the norm entailing obstruction of view that does no good but harm.

Hardcore Intellect

Many often get stuck in the web of mental destruction involuntarily. The first step to untangle oneself is to realize himself. Admitting the faults in what he is emitting. Envy and jealousy are enemies of contentedness. The viscous cycle of jealousy hinders intellectual progress. That is not to say that nothing good could come out of jealousy but if it did almost certainly it would be for the wrong reasons. Acts are based on intentions. Always asking oneself truthfully “What is my intention of doing this action?” is a good way to know our intentions.

Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) said (my translation of a portion of the Hadith)

Seek not materialistic things in this life The Almighty will love you, Seek not what people have the people will love you.

Anger is an immortal enemy of rational thinking. It blinds the mind. Avoiding anger at all costs could produce favorable outcomes. Being a stranger to anger reduces the danger from an unfortunate incident with a ranger.

A man asked prophet Mohamed (pbuh) to advice him; he replied thrice “Don’t get angry.”

Letting one’s heart be filled with hate reflects badly in social communications. Asking oneself the reason of hating anything could provide insights on how to manage it. Higher awareness reduces hate. Hating fate will not cause what is coming to be late.

Being a hardcore intellect requires minimization of all these traits. Growing one’s thought requires fewer distractions from such qualities. The continuation of progress is dependent on them.

What If?

What if how we think things are, are not what they are?
What if our cries were for the wrong tries?
What if when we heard the right call we played it down and went on with all?
What if we never knew that life is few?
What if we never asked what if, would we still remain so stiff?

What Will You Do?

What will you do when the sky is no longer blue?
What will you do when your own mother runs away from you?
What will you do when you exhausted every clue?
What will you do when you have no one left but you?
Does it matter then what you do or is it too late to run through?

What Will You Say?

What will you say when you stand between the hands of The Almighty?
What will you say when your hand bare witness on your brand?
What will you say when The Almighty command an explanation of what you did on land?
What will you say when you run out of any and?
Doesn’t matter what you say but justice is what you will get with no remand.

Who Among Us?

Who among us has never done wrong across their long fuss?
Who among us has never let his tongue toss a regrettable sidelong gloss?
Who among us has never experienced a lifelong loss?
You tell me who among us, I tell you he should be the boss.

What Would You Do As President

I posted these on aljazeera.net/english in reply to these questions.

What would you do as US president?

Hehe, after acquiring full control of Federal Reserve, I’ll assign the staff to auditing and locating all the gold in the world. Print mint to acquaint the pints. When all the gold is in a safe location in my house, I’ll issue a major scale auditing of the world’s wealth. Once twice thrice arise from my franchise, devise concise fries advice. I’ll not use wasteful tactics like wars to enslave other countries but use products and services. Domesticate the best ten cooks and masseuses in the world. Test all the top drugs to make sure they are safe for consumption. Commission all media transmissions to mission lovely emissions. Hand-tailor the best clothes from every other color. Find the most beautiful …. I think you get the picture.


What would be your policies?

Withdraw all troops from the 135 countries. Abolish illegal and unnecessary institutions. Complete investigation of everyone with questionable conduct. End United Nations & World Bank. Mandate and enforce peace on Israel and Palestine. Withdraw support from dictatorial regimes. Cease the madness of starvation and disease in Africa and Asia. All leaders in the world would be subject for investigation and then accordingly recommended for international crime courts for trial. Reform elections, remove financial debacles, dismantle the parties and make it open for all. Call retrial for all in jail. End racism from official documents and media regurgitations. Maybe I would pass the presidency to Dr. Ron Paul. A lot of this is from his platform. Nevertheless the theme will be,
Substitution of the constitution is institution of instant destitution.


What would be the first thing you would do as president?

Locating the exact point of achieving presidency is difficult but I assume it will be blink.

Please let me know what would you do.

Comments on Friday 25 April 2008 Alex Jones Show

I thought the Friday show had some really surreal deals. Appeal to common sense was absent while the feel of superstition was present. Instead of advising people not to believe what is said in temples, churches and synagogues without recruiting objectivity and reason to judge for themselves, people were left with the impression that some people have magical powers with words and should just be dismissed without the use of logic, realism and science.

Any religious study that compares various religions and excludes Islam is almost worthless. Islam introduced the intelligent scientific mindset to humanity. No religion is more reasonable, objective and scientific than Islam. Any person with half a brain while comparing religions unbiasedly will easily know Islam is the truth. Not a single verse in the holy Quran can be proved wrong. I challenge any other religion to claim that. If prophet Mohamed (pbuh) was not divinely guided do you think he would have stood the test of time? See what some honestly objective westerners said. Do you think people who say the truth are trying to profit from it? Tell me how.

Sir George Bernard Shaw in 'The Genuine Islam,' Vol. 1, No. 8, 1936.
"If any religion had the chance of ruling over England, nay Europe within the next hundred years, it could be Islam."
“I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him - the wonderful man and in my opinion for from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Savior of Humanity."
"I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today.”

Michael Hart in 'The 100, A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons In History,' New York, 1978.
My choice of Muhammad to lead the list of the world’s most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the secular and religious level. ...It is probable that the relative influence of Muhammad on Islam has been larger than the combined influence of Jesus Christ and St. Paul on Christianity. ...It is this unparalleled combination of secular and religious influence which I feel entitles Muhammad to be considered the most influential single figure in human history.

Dr. William Draper in 'History of Intellectual Development of Europe'
Four years after the death of Justinian, A.D. 569, was born in Mecca, in Arabia, the man who, of all men, has exercised the greatest influence upon the human race... To be the religious head of many empires, to guide the daily life of one-third of the human race, may perhaps justify the title of a Messenger of God.

If you want more quotes this is where I got them from.
http://www.cyberistan.org/islamic/quote1.html

Evil Receival

Mercy of sin is no hearsay. Imagine life without sin. Forgiveness will be inexistence. Evil people will be out of luck. Not much pleasure in this life or the afterlife. This oxymoron is no adiaphoron. Presence of sin alleviates the suffering of good people. Continuous devotion in every action will provide unease. As Dr. Al Qaradawi said that devils are of mindless desires while angels are of desireless minds.

For those who say the world is evil, therefore The Creator is evil (May Allah Forgive Us), I challenge them to count the blessings they experience in a day. What is the experience of indulging in the fruits and fine cuisine worth to you? What is the experience of helping someone along your way in the day worth to you? What is the experience of looking at your mother’s eyes after pleasing her worth to you? What is the experience of making someone smile worth to you? What is the experience of viewing in colors worth to you? Ever thought about the blessing of colors? Imagine life in black and white. These are few examples of the countless blessings that we dare not mention or thank The Provider for and instead focus on complaining about the imperfections.

Kingdom of Wisdom

The sooner we realize our contributory new findings in the fields of theology and philosophy are probably going to be limited the more beneficial we will start to be. This will reduce obsessiveness with trying to sound the wisest. Knowing the impossibility of being the wisest is from wisdom. Our knowledge is very limited. Therefore knowing our limitations is a form of wisdom. The kingdom of wisdom is knowing the dimensions of the ideal existence of the matter in hand.

A much wiser and better man Suliman (peace be upon him) said:

The head of wisdom is fearing Allah.

A Sinner is no Winner

Fear not the mischief The Protector is behind those with strong belief. The best stand the test even in unrest lest the pest infest the rest.

Correcting Einstein

Einstein Says, “Coincidence is God's way of remaining anonymous.”

This statement couldn’t be further from the truth. Coincidence is God’s way of showing us that things happen according to his will and we might not necessarily understand the reasoning at the time. Semi-believers only wish to keep the Almighty anonymous.


"Truth is what stands the test of experience."

Truth is what stands all tests.

Cafferty File Answers 15 April 2008

What’s the answer to rapidly rising food prices?

Reductions of gulosity, instructions of sparsity, inductions of spinosity and productions of necessity are some answers.



What is your reaction to BET founder and Clinton supporter Bob Johnson saying Barack Obama wouldn’t be where he is if he were white?

My reaction to such action is dissatisfaction. Any criterion used to judge a person other than virtue is like a van statue.

HBO Real time Blog Until 8 April 2008

Username: Opiner

Name Blame

Apr 2, 2008 6:20 PM

"What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy?" -Gandhi

I favor the core of the postulate on a general sense where the naming of objects doesn't change its constitute. "mad destruction" is a bad construction because it implies the cause is madness which justifies it. Mad people are not liable for their actions. These destructions are usually brought about under terrorism, barbaric regimes or evil principles and conduct enemy visions and not under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy.

Drop Atop or Chop-Chop Clip-Clop a Clippety-Clop to the Hippity-Hop Hilltop.

Apr 1, 2008 12:36 PM

Sacrifice of artifice and edifice to satisfice the front office is sometimes needed for the overall benefice.

Ideology Analogy

Apr 1, 2008 1:14 PM

Hi cosmonaut, I hope you're as well as spell can tell. The motive behind the bias could simply be a need to excrete the hate towards lords by swording records or rewording buzzwords. The gutter sinking verbiages might be expressages of unbandages from sewerage voyages. Demagogic logic is paralysis of dialogic cryptologic.

Religion Intercession

Apr 1, 2008 1:47 PM

True dimensions of religion disillusion expressions and provision progression.

LadyV2 Fady Sea Blue

Apr 2, 2008 2:23 PM

"I expect whoever takes the office to represent all Americans equally, fairly, and rationally."

The statement seems well intended but not deeply extended. Representing all in what exactly? This is an incomplete idea. How can someone represent all? This is impossibility. The foundation of the argument is the president should not favor one over another. In other words, a fair president.

Flooding is A Sodding?

Apr 2, 2008 2:41 PM

Are there no rules that ferule these skimble-skamble torrents.

CharlieDontSurf on Astroturf

Apr 1, 2008 8:28 PM

With all due respect to Thomas Paine but this quote is not fully thought through.

"When people fear the government, there is tyranny. When government fears the people, there is liberty."

Government commonly is either the set of policies managing the country or the collective employees under the different institutions. People fearing a set of rules or economical managerial doctrines does not necessarily produce tyranny. For example, if the US was a monarchy. People fearing the monarchical principles do not necessarily indicate existence of tyranny. Unfair judiciary and law enforcement systems signify tyranny. The other definition of government brings us to a socratical argument where they are us so how can we fear ourselves? Neither does fearing the people in the public force or the principles is a clear indicator of tyranny. Saying there is tyranny without regards to relativity implies an assured knowledge of states of being in practicality that tyranny is inexistent. From observation one could infer that tyranny persisted in most states. The underlying premise is fear indicates existence of liberty and tyranny does not affirm or confirm a firm squirm.

Re: What Would Make A Perfect Show?

Apr 1, 2008 1:55 PM

Dr. Zakir Naik and the most prominent Christian scholar and Rabbi in America engage in a civilized interfaith dialogue.

CharlieDontSurf Rough Turf

Apr 1, 2008 4:28 PM

Promoting digging one's head in mud and pretense our existence and creation are not there is demoting wigging. Until you can explain the creation of existence then one shouldn't delve into deep scientific, theocratic and philosophic subjects. Once you have sufficient education about them then you wouldn't be blatting this back-patting.

Re: What Would Make A Perfect Show?

Apr 1, 2008 5:42 PM

Thoughts conceived from dark barks are usually sparks of space marks. The nonsensical religious talks on the show appear to be founded from unsound confoundedness. The Hindu will make a good addition, the more core glore lore soars the more score we can explore.

Rumor Consumer

Apr 1, 2008 3:58 PM

The tumoral rumor of dishumor is stumor.

http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977298532&grpId=3659174697244816&nav=Groupspac

Re: The Bush Administration

Apr 1, 2008 2:01 PM

Favorability of the perception from the presidential memory will be proportional to the goodness it left behind.

Ideology Analogy

Apr 1, 2008 1:14 PM

Hi cosmonaut, I hope you're as well as spell can tell. The motive behind the bias could simply be a need to excrete the hate towards lords by swording records or rewording buzzwords. The gutter sinking verbiages might be expressages of unbandages from sewerage voyages. Demagogic logic is paralysis of dialogic cryptologic.

Re: What Issue Floats Your Boat?

Apr 1, 2008 4:39 PM

What issue do you think will drive this election?

Given the limited choices it becomes a matter of pen handgrip comfort while casting.

Cruel Ferule of A New Rule

Apr 1, 2008 5:24 PM

New Rule : If the media insists on adhering to misopedia then there every intermedia should be citing an encyclopedia.

Re: Cheating vs. Divorce vs. Suffering

Apr 1, 2008 3:42 PM

Bill brought up the question tonight:

In a loveless marriage where there was no chance of ever having family relations again, what should you do?

Let's see the underlying premise of this thought. We have "loveless marriage", "never had a chance", "family relations" and "again". "loveless marriage" raises infinite questions to why marriage would contradict its foundation. "where there was no chance of ever having" The abstractness of the exactness might be a distraction form the attraction. The criterion used for evaluations of the inexistence of a chance is absence. Regardless of criterion what the thereon states is unlikeliness. Family relations exist irrelevant of emotional relationship status between spouses. Therefore asserting a marriage never had a chance for family relations is a fallacy due to the misconceived direct relationship between the object and the subject. The underlying premise remises customized compromise or optimized surmise. The intent of the argument monuments questions when the options provided are slided. Most reasonable answer is to amend and tend to each other's reach is lost.

What would you do and how would it be different than what Gov. Spitzer decided to do?

Hehe, Anybody mentions my personal life ill-manneredly is subject for prosecution.

Slash Bash before the Match

Apr 3, 2008 8:17 PM

Islam lays it straight. Accusing someone of adultery without bringing four witnesses that saw them in the act, you get lashed.

Re: The Race for President

Apr 1, 2008 5:06 PM

Who will win their "parties" nomination? Correction: "party's" nominee can win one party only.

The obvious answer is the nominee that won at the end of the primaries however, I am willing to take a chance here and say McCain has a higher chance than Dr. Ron Paul if this overspending campaign funding scandal is dissolved before it evolved.

Who will be the next president?

The infinite possibilities make it hard to predict. Drama with the Dali Lama and Yokohama in Alabama are an aceldama when they cry for their mama in pajamas.

Who would you like to see in the race but isn't Mike Bloomberg, Al Gore, Dick Cheney?

Grace is his face.

Immense Sense of Offense

Apr 2, 2008 3:15 PM

What drives you INSANE about this election??

The absence of commonsense is the menace.

Re: Should Hillary just drop out of the race?

Apr 1, 2008 9:17 PM

Not all understand shot calls.

Re: Should Hillary just drop out of the race?

Apr 1, 2008 8:57 PM

Sometimes making a deal while you can is better than flan with a tan on the pan.

Marijuana OK for an Iguana but not Perpetuana?

Apr 2, 2008 8:26 PM

On the 3/21 show, Congressman Barney Frank stated the he was going to introduce a bill that stopped the federal government from prosecuting patients who smoked legally prescribed medical marijuana.

The bill implies legalizing marijuana for medical purposes. This bill will not fill answers about the pills. Restricting control of a substance to a small group of people is not usually advisable. Marijuana's benefit to society seems more than its harms. Comparing alcohol makes restrictions on marijuana seem unreasonable. Who or what gave the government the right to limit substances that are not dangerous? The bill should spill the will of Phil to instill a legalization drill for all and not only the ill.

Would it have any chance of passing?

Asking this question implies there is a chance. If there was no chance, then this question would not have been asked. The chance at a glance would dance around the stance of France.

GreenGiant Clean Suppliant

Apr 3, 2008 5:22 AM

Hi GreenGiant, I hope you are doing better than seagoing. You said, "Nobody use crack, cocaine, heroine, or any other illegal substance for medicinal purposes except marijuana." I am not sure exactly what this is based upon but cocaine, heroine and other restricted drugs are frequently used in pharmaceuticals. Heroin for example was founded by Bayer. Most of these drugs were found by the pharmaceutical industry. The tug of the drug plug mugs the rug under the shrug.

http://www.addictionscience.net/ASNclass.htm

Re: Barney Frank's Medical Marijuana Proposal

Apr 7, 2008 9:31 PM

Hello titannia, I hope toxicomania and squandermania are not your campania. You say,

"and almost any plant can heal you."

Any real appeal to this heal deal? The 400,000 were considered?

"Nothing is so bad it can't help someone,"

Is this in regards to tangibles only? How about a knout that mout redout the shout of a devout? What about snot that clot the spot, blot of carrot or rot in a pot?

"and nothing is so good it can't harm someone."

Why would anyone say this, baffles me. I think the meaning of harm was overlooked when typing this sentence. Why is beneficial advice harmful?

Racism Ostracism

Apr 3, 2008 11:26 PM

Increased racism in media recently by using racist terms like "black" "white" could hurt the Dali Lama's drama. The construct of the question obstruct any realistic suggestion. A question that presents two false options as the only available answers is as dancers table comely spree was captions. Unawareness of infinite possibilities is as disabilities limit bareness. Variance tarriance as luxuriance invariance is chance stance. The skewness of polls is the fewness of trolls.

The Democratic Autocratic Confedential Presidential Customaries Primaries

Apr 1, 2008 12:03 PM

Erratic democratic Socratics are a good start for a quadratic prodemocratic operatics.

McCain Booed Again as Rain Shampooed Stain

This is in regards to "McCain Booed At Martin Luther King Speech: Watch The Video" article at the HuffingtonPost.

Worse than insane voting is hairbrain stain promoting. Do true due to who do no boo. This should show our flow as no two narrow hollow. Taboo of a clue to know how to glue new brew is of no value. Misbehavior of Mr. Savior is inferior to a junior.

Answer for Caffertyfile 7 April 2008

How can Hillary Clinton turn things around in the next couple of weeks?

Greetings & Peace. Hi Jack, I hope all the clack helps slack your back. Once again full considerations about words weren’t desiderations. Rationing rational information leads to immoderation. I assumed “can” means be able to accomplish, “how” means by what means or process, in this context. But the question is suspicious of ability to accomplish the task by its wording. The process to access success is to confess like a princess and address press with caress unless excess stress is a mess. Upturn of the turning things is by a u-turn at Saturn to return ourn.